Technology, Media & Telecom Intelligence Report
April 2024

 

Mobile carriers are flooding the airwaves with catchy commercials boasting about their ability to provide affordable, high-speed home internet. The advertising push aims to build awareness for Fixed Wireless Access (FWA).

FWA is an innovative new form of 5G or 4G LTE wireless technology that delivers high-speed internet by leveraging existing wireless networks run by Mobile Network Operators (MNOs). While FWA is unlikely to be as fast a connection as Fiber, it is fast enough to connect at a speed that handles most internet needs.

Advancements in 5G technology allow FWA to provide higher data rates, reduced latency, and improved reliability. 5G-based FWA has the potential to rival traditional wired connections, enabling gigabit speeds and unlocking new applications and services. According to the latest JD Power data, customers with FWA are embracing the new technology, as FWA is already besting fiberoptic service in terms of customer satisfaction.

Fixed Wireless Access Resonates with Consumers

In an analysis of customer experiences with FWA services, JD Power finds that the benefits extend across diverse residential landscapes. In fact, 5G FWA users have the highest satisfaction, regardless of their location. Fiber, while a strong contender, ranks second in customer satisfaction, underlining the robust performance of 5G FWA in meeting user expectations across various geographies.
 

TMT Chart 1

With recent advancements in capabilities, Cable internet has successfully increased its speed capabilities, rivaling those of Fiber. When evaluating customer satisfaction, both Cable and Fiber internet prove to be on par with each other, matching the performance of 4G LTE FWA. However, both trail 5G FWA, as the satisfaction levels associated with 5G FWA surpass all other forms of internet by an impressive margin of more than 20 points (on a 1,000-point scale).

TMT Chart 2

The Price Factor

While the performance and reliability of both fiber and 5G internet are high, the primary distinguishing factor between connection types is the cost of service.

TMT Chart 3

While Fiber and 5G FWA exhibit comparable performance and reliability experience scores 5G FWA leads on cost-of-service by a margin of more than 60 points. As customers still wrestle with a high cost of consumer goods and inflation stubbornly hovers around 3%, cost will likely play a pivotal role in industry disruption, with all signs pointing toward more customers actively seeking out FWA.

The Next Frontier

FWA is broadening the scope for wireless carriers, allowing companies offering fiberoptic and mobile networks to expand into new territories. That means more choices for customers and, ultimately, a broader spectrum to search for the best price and experience.

The implications for companies like T-Mobile, which can offer this affordable alternative without cutting into other aspects of their businesses, or for a potential disrupter looking to make waves in the space, could be revolutionary. As FWA adoption grows, companies currently in the industry and curious onlookers will surely be taking notice.

Find out More

This Technology, Media & Telecom Intelligence Report is based on data from the 2023 U.S. Residential Internet Service Provider Satisfaction Study, which includes responses from 23,623 customers that currently have internet service with a provider and was fielded from October 2022 through August 2023. It was authored by Carl Lepper, senior director of the technology, media and telecommunications intelligence practice at JD Power. Please contact us at the numbers below to connect with Mr. Lepper or to learn more about the underlying research.

 

Media Contacts

Brian Jaklitsch; East Coast; 631-584-2200; [email protected]

Geno Effler, JD Power; West Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected]

Technology, Media, and Telecom Intelligence Report
November 2023

Loyalty among Live TV Streamers Much Stronger than Cable and Satellite Customers

No cord? No problem. At least, no loyalty problems. Even though it may be easier to switch streaming service than it is to change cable or satellite providers, customers in the United States are far more loyal to streamers than traditional television providers.

According to the latest JD Power data, the likelihood of live TV streaming customers switching services in the next year is just 12%, while the likelihood of cable and satellite customers switching is 21%.

It’s a surprising trend, given the nature of each of the platforms. While customers have traditionally shied away from switching cable/satellite providers due to service bundles and the clunky cancelation and installation processes or been leery of relying on shaky service from streamers instead of the tried-and-true platform they were accustomed to, those attitudes have shifted, thanks to the superior customer care and problem resolution that streamers are providing its users. 

YouTube TV is King of Live TV Streamers

YouTube TV is now ranked best among live TV streaming customers, a huge boon to the streamer who has provided great service amid an uptick in subscribers due to some big rights acquisitions.

Overall Satisfaction

YouTube TV (795) improves more than any other Live TV streaming provider this year and ranked highest in Live TV streaming satisfaction to beat out Hulu + Live TV (785), and Sling TV (772). 

DISH Keeps its Crown among Cable/Satellite

For a sixth consecutive year, DISH ranks highest in the cable/satellite TV–national segment with a score of 709. DIRECTV (705) ranks second.

Bar Graph

DISH performed exceedingly well in two markets, as it ranks highest in the cable/satellite TV in both the U.S. North Central (699) and South (725) regions. Verizon Fios ranks highest in the East region, while DIRECTV ranks highest in the West region (704). 

Graph of Regions

The Growing Divide

What’s driving this chasm between cable/satellite and streaming providers? A multitude of factors. The largest difference (156 points) was in the cost of service, with cable/satellite providers just not being able to compete on price with the live TV streamers. But live TV streaming providers also distinguished themselves from their cable/satellite counterparts in customer care (80 points), performance and reliability (64 points), and billing and payments (60 points). 

Television Factor Satisfaction

Customer care was the area of largest year-over-year improvement for live TV streaming. Customers reported improvements across all care channels, including phone (+24 points); website (+17), and the streamer’s respective apps (+8). Hulu + Live TV has the highest customer care satisfaction score, with YouTube jumping into second thanks to a 49-point improvement. Overall, 30% of all streaming customers that contacted customer service this year, and 84% felt the provider made it somewhat or very easy to resolve their problem.

Swimming Up-Stream

In the past, cable/satellite providers may have been the beneficiaries of their status as a legacy model that had a high degree of difficulty in switching or outright canceling. But these providers can no longer rest on their laurels. The improvements made in customer care have vaulted live TV streamers to a different level in terms of satisfaction and loyalty, and the subscribers that are on the fence about switching have taken note.   

Streamers have always been a more affordable choice, but there was always a trade-off in reliability and customer care. Now, with streamers succeeding in all areas, cable and satellite providers have no choice to step up their game and rise to the occasion. If they don’t, they run the very real risk of fading into the background faster than anyone anticipated. 

Find Out More

This Technology, Media, and Telecom Intelligence Report is based on responses from 23,584 customers and was fielded from October 2022 through August 2023. It was authored by Carl Lepper, senior director of technology, media, and telecom intelligence at JD Power. Please contact us at the numbers below to connect with Mr. Lepper or to learn more about the underlying research.

Media Contacts

Brian Jaklitsch; East Coast; 631-584-2200; [email protected]

Geno Effler, JD Power; West Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected]

TMT Intelligence Report
October 2022


As U.S. Households Now Subscribe to More Streaming Services than Ever, Customer Satisfaction Starts to Decline

  • Viewers increased their number of subscriptions, with 60% having at least four services. However, the average monthly household spend stays consistent at $54 in July 2022 vs. $55 in June 2021.
  • Overall satisfaction with streaming services is declining, particularly across content quality and subscription cost, which declined the most in July 2022 from June 2021 (-0.41 and -0.38, respectively).
  • Netflix remains the largest and most popular brand among survey respondents. More than twice as many customers (39%) chose Netflix than the next most popular services, Amazon Prime Video (14%) and Hulu (14%).
  • Streaming problems decreased, with 80% of viewers reporting no issues.

Streaming services may be heading into tougher times. Not only is the competition fierce and cost of acquiring and producing content high; subscribers may be nearing their limit with how many subscriptions they carry and what they spend. To gain more insight into the state of the market, JD Power conducted a fourth installment of its streaming pulse survey in July 2022. It consists of responses from 1,287 U.S. adults who shared their viewing preferences, usability challenges and plans for using these subscription-based services. Following are the key findings.

Streaming Subscriptions May Have Peaked

As the world gradually returns to normal, loosened public health restrictions have allowed many of the hardest-hit sectors – such as live sports and entertainment, dining, and travel – to meet or exceed pre-pandemic levels of activity.

However, quarantine viewing habits persist, with customers in the United States subscribing to more streaming services than ever before.

In fact, 60% of streaming households now subscribe to four or more streaming services, up from 57% in June 2021.

Graph 1

Despite this growth, subscription fatigue is gaining ground. More than three-fourths (82%) of streamers expect to maintain their current lineup and make no changes to their services during the next 30 days. Only 9% plan to add a new service.

Graph 2

Interestingly, an increase in the number of streaming subscriptions did not lead to higher overall reported costs.

In fact, the average reported monthly household spend on all streaming services has remained relatively consistent at $54 in July 2022 vs. $55 in June 2021.

Graph 3

This consistency is likely due to the bundles and affordable add-ons offered by streaming services1. For example, consumers can purchase the Disney bundle, which includes Hulu, Disney+ and ESPN+, for $13.99 a month. The package saves $11 a month compared with buying each service individually.

Customers can also save on subscription costs by taking advantage of numerous discounts and free trials. In addition to the deals offered by streaming providers themselves, wireless carriers, internet providers, big box retailers, and device manufacturers have all promoted lengthy free streaming trials to entice consumers. Verizon, T-Mobile, Cricket Wireless, Xfinity, Roku, Google Chromecast, and Walmart are just a few of the brands incorporating streaming into other products and services.

The cost plateau will be short-lived, however, as price hikes have recently been announced by multiple providers. Last month, the Walt Disney Company announced rate increases2 for each of its streaming services:

  • ESPN+ jumped almost 43% in late August, going from $6.99 a month to $9.99 a month.
  • Hulu’s new (and significantly higher) rate goes into effect in October. The ad-free premium plan will increase to $14.99 a month from $2 a month, while the ad-supported option will rise to $7.99 a month from $6.99 a month.
  • The Disney+ ad-free plan will increase 38% in December, rising to $10.99 a month from $7.99 a month. The new ad-supported tier will also launch in December at $7.99 a month.

Additionally, next summer’s merger of HBO Max and Discovery+ will likely result in a new—and more expensive—pricing structure. During the recent Goldman Sachs Communacopia Tech Conference3, Warner Bros. Discovery CFO Gunnar Wiedenfels claimed that the company’s two most popular streaming services are “fundamentally underpriced.” Currently, the ad-free version of HBO Max is $14.99 a month and $9.99 a month with ads, while Discovery+ is $6.99 a month without ads and $4.99 a month with ads.

Groceries vs. Game of Thrones

Even as inflation problems persist and consumers spend less on non-essentials, media executives are confident that subscribers will see the value in their premium, original content.

Disney CEO Bob Chapek recently stated4 that increasing prices “even in big chunks” will not diminish its value to the consumer and that “churn implications” will be “negligible.”

Across the board, streaming providers are investing heavily in epic prequels, award-winning series returns, blockbuster movies and live sports to keep subscribers engaged and minimize churn rates.
For example, the first season of Amazon’s highly anticipated series, “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power,” is estimated to have cost $715 million, making it the most expensive TV show of all time.

This costly, content-driven customer acquisition and retention strategy may create lifts in net subscriber counts, but satisfaction with streaming services declined in July 2022 from June 2021, most notably across content quality (-0.41) and subscription cost (-0.38).

Graph 4

Despite only declining slightly to 4.86 in July 2022 from 5.03 in June 2021, Overall Satisfaction is the lowest since this survey’s inception. Additionally, fewer respondents considered their streaming service to be “perfect” (10% in July 2022 vs. 15% in June 2021.)

Graph 5

To stand out from the competition, brands might prioritize further developing an intuitive, dependable user experience that marries premium content with ease of navigation, personalized recommendations, and cross-platform reliability. It’s been said that “people make promoters, but defects make detractors;” obsessively lowering the number of streaming problems experienced reduces a common impetus for shopping other streaming services.

With subscription rates rising—and streaming satisfaction declining across the board—focusing on delivering a delightful user experience is the best way for providers to retain loyalty and drive growth. 

This is especially true in the churn zone – the initial stages of a subscription when customers have exhausted the content library and are most likely to drop a provider. Customers who have been with their streaming provider for less than one month are most likely to indicate they are planning to drop a streaming provider within the next 30 days (19% vs. 10% for the total industry).

Graph 6

Netflix Is Synonymous with Streaming

Netflix is the streaming provider respondents don’t want to live without.

Despite suffering at the hands of Wall Street and subscriber counts in the first half of 2022, Netflix is still a favorite among the public. When asked to choose only one streaming service, more than twice as many customers surveyed would choose Netflix (39%) than the next most popular selections, Amazon Prime Video (14%) and Hulu (14%).

Graph 7

Simply put, the streaming giant has become a staple in most households. Over 90% of customers that have at least four streaming services will have Netflix.

Graph 8

Competition Advances on Netflix

Chrissy (Netflix), wake up! The record-breaking success of Stranger Things 4, which debuted May 27, helped Netflix maintain its market share, but competition is advancing.

Despite a slight dip from June 2021 (and a loss of nearly 1 million subscribers in Q2 20225), Netflix remains the largest brand with 82% of respondents saying they subscribe, followed by Amazon Prime (67%), Hulu (60%) and Disney+ (55%).

The top three streaming providers all saw market share decrease from June 2021. Disney+ was the only streaming service among the top four to show gains and is quickly closing the gap.

Graph 9

Heavy Streaming Subsides

Unsurprisingly, a return to normalcy during the past year has led to a decrease in heavy streaming.

Graph 10

The heaviest time streaming is spent among the Live TV Streaming providers, with YouTube TV and DirecTV Stream capturing the most extensive streaming durations (12.4 weekly hours and 9.8 weekly hours, respectively).

Graph 11

Heavier streaming time has its disadvantages, however, as YouTube TV viewers struggle the most with problems while streaming. Amazon, Disney+ and Hulu provide the most trouble-free viewership experience.

Graph 12

Overall, streaming problems are substantially decreasing. 80% of streamers indicate having no issues while streaming in July 2022. This is the lowest incidence of problems since fielding began.

Graph 13

 

Source 1: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/04/dont-expect-cable-tv-like-package-for-streaming-bundles.html 

Source 2: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/10/disney-raises-price-on-ad-free-disney-38percent-as-part-of-new-pricing-structure.html  

Source 3: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4540787-warner-bros-discovery-inc-wbd-goldman-sachs-communacopia-technology-conference-2022

Source 4: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4541086-walt-disney-company-dis-goldman-sachs-communacopia-technology-conference-2022-transcript

Source 5: https://ir.netflix.net/investor-news-and-events/investor-events/event-details/2022/Netflix-Second-Quarter-2022-Earnings-Interview/default.aspx

 

Find out More

This TMT Intelligence Report is based on responses from 1,287 U.S. adults who shared their viewing preferences, usability challenges and plans for using these subscription-based services. It was authored by Ian Greenblatt, managing director of TMT intelligence, and Carl Lepper, senior director of TMT intelligence. Please contact us at the numbers below to connect with Mr. Greenblatt and Mr. Lepper or to learn more about the underlying research.

 

Media Contacts

Brian Jaklitsch; East Coast; 631-584-2200; [email protected]

Geno Effler, JD Power; West Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected]