Insights

Tagged:
Clear filters
Industry
Topic
Segment
Two people at table reviewing an Insurance Plans application form with calculator

Press Release

Auto Insurers Struggle to Maintain Seamless Interactions Across Channels, JD Power Finds

TROY, Mich.: 9 June 2026 — As the auto insurance market continues to soften, customers are holding more of the power—and they’re using it, according to the JD Power 2026 U.S. Auto Insurance Study,SM released today. Separate JD Power data[1] indicates that approximately one‑third of auto insurance shoppers now turn to artificial intelligence (AI) tools when comparing coverage, and those who do are significantly more likely to switch insurers. Yet even as competition intensifies and prices ease, an increase in overall customer satisfaction is being held back by insurers’ inability to deliver truly seamless interactions across channels.
""|Image 1 (MSRP variability / F-150 example): “Chart showing a wide MSRP range for the same 2024 Ford F-150 Lariat 4WD SuperCrew trim

News

Vehicle Configuration Complexity and Strong Used-Vehicle Market Wreak Havoc on Auto Insurance Valuation Models and Carrier Profitability 

Vehicle configuration complexity has increased exponentially over the last 10 years, primarily driven by a shift from mechanical systems to "software-defined" architectures, with over 600,000 unique vehicle configurations sold in North America in the 2025 model yearAverage used-vehicle retail prices have risen 20% in the past five yearsAuto insurance actuarial models built on incomplete vehicle identification data could be off by upwards of $15,000 per vehicle Henry Ford famously said that customers “could have a Model T in any color they want—so long as it was black.” Today’s automotive market could not be more different. Vehicle customization has exploded over the past decade as automakers compete to meet increasingly specific consumer preferences. For example, in the large pickup truck segment, the Ford F-150 currently has upwards of 100,000 unique build configurations and, market-wide, more than 600,000 unique vehicle configurations were sold in the United States in the last year alone, according to JD Power data.While this level of customization has benefited consumers and automakers, it has created a growing challenge for auto insurers. Many actuarial models used to price and underwrite policies still rely on simplified vehicle identification data that cannot fully capture the configuration and replacement value of modern vehicles. At the same time, volatility in used-vehicle pricing and rising repair costs are further complicating valuation models that were built for a far more predictable market.This combination of vehicle complexity and market volatility is creating a widening gap between the values insurers assume during underwriting and the costs they ultimately face when repairing or replacing vehicles after a claim.This Insurance Intelligence Report explores key data points gathered from JD Power studies and proprietary market data to offer a data-driven perspective on the current state of insurance industry vehicle valuations. Widespread MSRP Variability Within the Same TrimOne of the most significant challenges insurers face today is the dramatic variability in vehicle pricing—even among vehicles that appear nearly identical on the surface. Automakers now offer a wide range of factory-installed options, packages and custom features that can dramatically affect a vehicle’s price. From advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and upgraded powertrains to premium interiors and specialty paint packages, two vehicles with the same year, make, model and trim can have vastly different original values.For example, a 2024 Ford F-150 Lariat 4WD SuperCrew with a 5.5-foot bed could have been sold for approximately $69,630 with standard options, while a fully optioned version of the same vehicle could reach $84,465, according to JD Power data. For insurers, this creates a consequential underwriting blind spot. Unless they have access to the full 17-digit vehicle identification number (VIN) and the corresponding OEM build data tied to that VIN, they may not know which configuration they are actually insuring—creating up to $14,835 in unknown price variability.Many insurers rely on a shortened VIN identifier—often referred to as a “squish VIN”—when building underwriting models or quoting policies. While this truncated VIN provides basic information such as year, make, model, and sometimes trim level, it lacks the detailed configuration data needed to accurately assess a vehicle’s full replacement value.As vehicle configuration complexity continues to increase, reliance on simplified vehicle identification methods can introduce significant pricing inaccuracies into underwriting models.The Great Used Vehicle Price ResetVehicle complexity is only part of the challenge. The used-vehicle market has also undergone significant structural changes over the past several years.The average used-vehicle retail price is now $29,488, reflecting a more than 20% increase over the past five years, according to JD Power data. Much of this increase can be traced to supply shortages caused by pandemic-era production disruptions, which limited the availability of late-model used vehicles entering the market. For insurers, this volatility creates another modeling challenge. Traditional valuation models have long relied on the assumption that most mass-market vehicles depreciate roughly 20% per year. However, recent market dynamics have disrupted those historical depreciation patterns.Take the earlier example of the 2024 Ford F-150. Today, that vehicle is worth approximately $50,965, representing a 28% decline from its original MSRP. Under traditional depreciation models, insurers might have estimated the vehicle’s current replacement value at roughly $55,165, resulting in a $4,200 gap between projected and actual value. EV’s are further complicating traditional valuation models as EVs are projected to lose 59% of their value over five years, compared to an industry average of 46% for all vehicle types, according to JD Power data.Across millions of insured vehicles, valuation discrepancies like this can meaningfully impact claims severity and insurer profitability. More Tech, More ProblemsAnother major factor complicating insurance valuation models is the rapid expansion of vehicle technology. Modern vehicles increasingly include ADAS such as automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance and collision avoidance technologies. While these features improve safety and help reduce the likelihood of severe accidents, they can significantly increase repair costs when collisions occur.Sensors, cameras and radar modules are often embedded in bumpers, mirrors, windshields and body panels. Even minor accidents can require expensive sensor replacements and complex recalibration procedures.Accurately modeling this risk requires insurers to know precisely which safety technologies are installed on each vehicle they insure. Without accurate, detailed VIN-level configuration data, insurers may not have visibility into which vehicles contain these systems and which do not—introducing further uncertainty into repair cost projections. AI TransformationAs insurers increasingly adopt AI-driven underwriting, claims automation and pricing optimization tools, the importance of accurate foundational data becomes even greater. Artificial intelligence models are only as effective as the data used to train them. Without precise vehicle configuration and valuation inputs, AI systems risk amplifying inaccuracies rather than improving decision-making.Insurers that modernize their vehicle data infrastructure will be better positioned to price risk accurately, control claims severity and maintain profitability in an increasingly complex automotive landscape. Cracking the CodeWith the average new-vehicle transaction price now exceeding $46,000, insurers should expect continued upward pressure on vehicle repair and replacement costs. However, rising costs do not necessarily mean insurers must accept greater pricing uncertainty.Insurance has always been about accurately measuring and pricing risk. In today’s competitive environment, doing so requires more precise data about the vehicles being insured.As vehicle complexity has accelerated, insurers need to be able to track more detail than what’s currently available in “squish vin” datasets. Access to full 17-digit VIN configuration data, OEM build information, real-time vehicle valuation insights and feature-level vehicle attributes can help insurers build more accurate underwriting models, improve claims severity forecasting and better align pricing with actual risk. What Lies AheadFor an insurer, moving from generic VIN decoding to precise, configuration-level data transforms the business from reactive to surgical. As vehicles have become "computers on wheels," with significant price variations, knowing the exact build data—not just the year, make, and model—is the difference between profitability and a loss ratio spike.After years of record rate increases and now that pricing issues have been resolved, auto insurance carriers are pulling out all the stops to grow. By shifting from broad vehicle categories to precise, VIN-level configuration data, insurers are gaining the pricing confidence needed to aggressively target new growth opportunities by selling to a broader set of consumers with varying degrees of risk. Find out MoreThis Insurance Intelligence Report was authored by James Vecchio, Head of VIN Products at JD Power. The analysis draws on JD Power studies, proprietary market data, and VIN‑level configuration and valuation intelligence, including insights derived from the JD Power StudyPrice 2.0 tool, which decodes the full 17‑digit VIN to reflect a vehicle’s exact build profile.JD Power Specialty Vehicles provides P&C insurance carriers with advanced decoding and valuation products for powersports, marine, recreational vehicles, classic cars, commercial trucks, and manufactured housing. Available via subscription, our data is the most accurate and robust in these industries—trusted by more than 90% of the market.To learn more about the research, underlying methodology, or vehicle valuation capabilities available to insurers, please contact the JD Power Insurance Intelligence team.Media ContactsBrian Jaklitsch; East Coast; 631-584-2200; [email protected] LaMuraglia, JD Power; East Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected]
""|View the 2025 Q4 Financial Services Churn Data and Analytics Report

News

FinTech Brands Continue to Attract and Convert New Banking and Investment Accounts

Chime sees highest new customer acquisition for checking accounts and conversion rates for checking and savings accountsFidelity leads on new investment account openings, SoFi leads on investment account conversion rateBank of America and Chase capture highest percentage of mass affluent and affluent banking customers The “soft switching” phenomenon, whereby banking and investment services customers are opening secondary accounts and quietly making them their primary relationships, continues for a second consecutive quarter in the JD Power Financial Services Churn Data and Analytics report.The report, which tracks customer attrition among the nation’s leading financial services providers, finds that FinTech brands, such as Chime and SoFi have become the biggest beneficiaries of this trend, attracting and converting new account openings faster than more established financial services brands. The trend is particularly noteworthy in the mass market banking segment, while traditional brands continue to lead on new account openings in the mass affluent and affluent banking segments[1]. Chime Leads on New Bank Account Openings and ConversionsJust under half of new checking (49%) and savings (46%) account openings in the fourth quarter of 2025 were for secondary accounts, opened by customers who already have an existing banking relationship, while 26% of checking and 18% of savings account openings were replacement accounts. Brand new banking relationships among customers who did not previously have a banking or checking account represented 25% of all checking and 36% of all savings account openings. This pattern of secondary account opening, which is consistent with Q3 2025, suggests that more banking customers are expanding and diversifying away from their primary deposit relationships. Chime claimed the largest share of new checking account openings in Q4 with 12.8%. It was followed by Chase (8.4%) and Wells Fargo (7.1%). Among new savings account openings, Chase saw the largest overall market share at 9%. It was followed by Chime (8.4%) and Bank of America (6.3%).One area where Chime has continued to show strength for a second consecutive quarter is its conversion rate—the percentage of time the checking account was opened with the bank after customers evaluated other brands. Overall, Chime has the highest conversion rate for customers who considered opening checking (78%) and savings accounts (85%). For both checking and savings accounts, Chime consistently outperformed both FinTechs and more established brands on new account conversion. Bank of America and Chase Win More Affluent Banking CustomersWhen it comes to targeting higher income, and higher net worth, customers, the Big Four national banks are outperforming FinTech brands. Among checking account openings, Chime led on customer acquisition in the mass market segment, claiming 11.5% of new customers, while Chase led in the mass-affluent segment, with 10.9% of new customers, and Bank of America led in the affluent segment, with 14.1% of new customers in Q4. A similar trend played out in savings accounts, where Chime led mass market customer acquisition with 11.5% market share, and Chase led in both the mass affluent (9.7%) and affluent (11.5%) segments. Investment Account Openings, SoFi Converts More CustomersIn the investment account category, Fidelity claimed the largest share of new account openings in Q4 with 16.8%. It was followed by Charles Schwab (9.1%) and Robinhood (8%). When it came to new account conversions, however, FinTech brand SoFi claimed the lead, capturing 83.1% of accounts that were opened after other brands were evaluated. SoFi was followed by Fidelity (80.2%) and Acorns (78.2%) When segmenting customer acquisition by total investible assets, Fidelity maintained the top position among mass market (16.3%), mass affluent (17.7%) and affluent (16.4%) customers. It is followed by Robinhood (10.5%) in the mass market segment and Charles Schwab in the mass affluent (10.8%) and affluent (13.1%) segments. A Mature Market Ripe for DisruptionThe findings in this report are noteworthy because they spotlight a critical transition point in the decision-making process of financial services customers as they evaluate a steadily growing list of brands and options for how to manage their money. We are clearly seeing a trend toward more consumer interest and experimentation with relatively new FinTech brands, particularly in the mass market segment. The fact that many of these brands are succeeding at converting customers suggests that effective digital engagement will play a major role in the future development of the financial services industry. Incumbent brands need to monitor this trend closely and make sure they are continuing to connect with the right customers at the right time with the right approach. Find out MoreThis Financial Services Intelligence Report is based on 263,151 responses collected as part of the JD Power Financial Services Churn Data and Analytics report between October and December 2025. It was authored by Jennifer White, senior director, financial services intelligence at JD Power. Please contact us at the numbers below to connect with the team or to learn more about the underlying research. Media Contacts Brian Jaklitsch; East Coast; 631-584-2200; [email protected] LaMuraglia, JD Power; East Coast; 714-621-6224; [email protected] [1] JD Power defines wealth categories for banking as Mass Market (income
Bank customer uses AI for Financial Advice|In the past 3 months

News

As More U.S. Consumers Struggle with Rising Prices, Many Turn to Artificial Intelligence for Financial Advice

With prices on consumer goods increasing at the fastest rate in five months in July, the number of consumers in the United States classified as financially unhealthy (1) has climbed to its highest level in 12 months, as measured by JD Power.As these struggling consumers increasingly seek guidance on a wide range of financial topics from budgeting to investing, many are turning to artificial intelligence (AI) tools for help.

News

AI + Insurance: Key Event Takeaways | Insurance Intelligence Podcast | Ep 13

The JD Power Insurance Intelligence Podcast recently featured a special episode on AI insurance, highlighting key insights from the AI + Insurance Conference in Chicago. This insurance industry podcast explores the cutting-edge developments in artificial intelligence and its impact on the insurance sector.Insurance Podcast Highlights:Tune in to the latest episode of our insurance podcast, where JD Power experts Michael Vermillion, Stephen Crewdson, and Mark Garrett delve into the future of AI insurance. The JD Power Insurance Intelligence Podcast offers invaluable insights for insurance professionals and tech enthusiasts alike, discussing the latest trends and innovations shaping the industry.
Health Insurance Card|Commercial Member Health Plan Stats

News

Winning New Business Strategies for Commercial Health Plans

Health insurance is a cornerstone of the employer value proposition and offering health coverage from a trusted, reputable insurer can significantly affect employee satisfaction and retention. In fact, 62% of employees say their benefits package makes them more inclined to stay with their current employer. Moreover, employees who feel their company genuinely cares about their well-being are 5.8 times more likely to stay for the long term.Given the importance of benefits to employees, it is imperative that plan sponsors look for commercial health plan providers that are committed to member satisfaction. This also presents a key opportunity for commercial health plan marketers tasked with growing an insurance company's membership through plan sponsors.

Displaying 12 of 74 insights